Register

Board index » Stillers Talk » Ben v Eli

Anything and everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers
Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 314
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 4:24 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Steeledge » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:09 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:Well if your a betting man sir put your money where you mouth is. Lets see whos telling the truth about being a Lawyer or not. PUT UP OR SHUT SIR.

...oh, brother, here we go... :roll:

I never claimed to be a Flaw-yer, "sir," nor would I ever want to...

As you've proven time and again, you don't have to be in a particular profession to be a dipshit...

just be a dipshit...
...and "Lets" see "whos" constantly demonstrating that he's an un-educated dipshit the likes of which no self-respecting law firm or DA's office would ever go near, shall we?... :sufu:

This reminds me of the time La-scaid here wanted me to send him a picture to prove who was fatter, him or me... :roll:

OK, I give in, here's that picture of me that you so desperately wanted...

Image

I know, I do kind of look fat in this...

Oh, well, I hope the picture does something for you anyway.

You could even print it out in wallet size and keep it with you always.
...for your FREQUENT "special" alone times...

Scalaid6 wrote:IF ANYBODY SHUTS ME UP THIS SITE IS DEAD. ONE THING ABOUT SCALAID, HE PROMOTES BOARD ACTIVITY. FACT

:roll: :roll: :roll:

FACT: Negative attention is still attention.
Any board activity you garner is only to call you out as the stupid, football-ignorant moron that you are.

...over and over again...

However, THIS SITE went on way before you, and will continue on way after...
Wha make you tink I won cutchu, mang?!?

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:23 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby octopoon » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:13 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:
octopoon wrote:
Scalaid6 wrote:Maybe if Ben would have got rid of the ball instead of taking senseless sacks, perhaps he would have had more tds. Brady won without moss sir. He lost WITH him. Wayne and Harrison are products of Peyton mannings greatness, they would be average anywhere else. What wr has Ben made better? We throw more NOW than we did when Kordell played. How does Kordell the BUM, throw 100 passes to Hines and Ben cant? How does Kordell go 13-3 and Ben CANT? Answer that please sir.


Now you're just coming off as a nonsensical hater.

Move along, nothing to see here.

Answer the question sir. You have 6 posts to my 600 YOU MOVE ON!


I believe it was just last year where Ben set the franchise record for TDs.

You were saying?

EDIT: TDs in one season
Last edited by octopoon on Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 314
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 4:24 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Steeledge » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:20 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:You have 6 posts to my 600!

A whole lot of senseless driveling shit is still senseless driveling shit!!! :supissed: :sufu:

...whether it's with one post or a million...
Wha make you tink I won cutchu, mang?!?

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Scalaid6 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:22 pm

I have NEVER said Ben sucked. If I did then SHOW ME. Again, where have I lied on Ben. Its funny, NOBODY cant show me ONE lie. We will remain Diametrically Opposed but either your right or I am and If YOUR right, I have nothing to lose as my Steelers will win. If I'M right Byron will get in and you will see visual proof of what I have said all along. The sacks are a result of Ben NOT the line.
Image

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:18 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby McLovin » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:25 pm

Byron? Byron?? Is Scalaid high like holmes?

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Scalaid6 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:25 pm

Yes Ben set franchise record for Tds. The variables are that Terry played when offenses attacked by RUNNING the ball. Again, a misleading fact. Is Ben better than Terry?. How come you guys cant answer these questions?
1. Is Ben better than Peyton and Brady
2. Show me ONE time I have lied on Ben
3. Is Ben better than Bradshaw.
:celebrate:

You might have been here before the split sir but that OTHER site has been recruiting YOURS TRULY, why is that sir???
Image

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Scalaid6 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:27 pm

McLovin wrote:Byron? Byron?? Is Scalaid high like holmes?

I just said that about you sir. Can you stop piggy backing my ideas? For an idiot, alot of people sure pay this idiot alot of attention. :celebrate:
Image

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:23 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby octopoon » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:29 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:I have NEVER said Ben sucked. If I did then SHOW ME. Again, where have I lied on Ben. Its funny, NOBODY cant show me ONE lie. We will remain Diametrically Opposed but either your right or I am and If YOUR right, I have nothing to lose as my Steelers will win. If I'M right Byron will get in and you will see visual proof of what I have said all along. The sacks are a result of Ben NOT the line.


You say you wouldn't trust Ben to win a close game, backpedal when presented with facts which prove otherwise, and then have the audacity to compare Ben with Kordell.

Basically, you're a moron - not a liar.

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:23 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby octopoon » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:33 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:Yes Ben set franchise record for Tds. The variables are that Terry played when offenses attacked by RUNNING the ball. Again, a misleading fact. Is Ben better than Terry?. How come you guys cant answer these questions?
1. Is Ben better than Peyton and Brady
2. Show me ONE time I have lied on Ben
3. Is Ben better than Bradshaw.
:celebrate:


1. This is(was) a thread about Ben and Eli.
2. Having a peanut-sized brain doesn't make you a liar.
3. See 1

Scalaid6 wrote:You might have been here before the split sir but that OTHER site has been recruiting YOURS TRULY, why is that sir???


Every circus needs a clown, and every troll needs food.

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Scalaid6 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:35 pm

A moron? Thank you for the comment sir. I dont trust Ben due to indecisiveness. His indecision is the reason he gets sacked ALOT. Just like Randall, just like Vick, just like Kordell. I mentioned Kordell going 13-3 and throwing over 100 balls to Hines to substantiate my point that Qbs have good stats BASED ON HOW GOOD OUR TEAM IS. If I said Kordell was better than Ben or even in his league then SHOW ME.
Nobody has yet to produce ONE lie I have told on Ben, so its safe to say I SPEAK THE TRUTH ABOUT HIM.
Image

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Scalaid6 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:36 pm

Im a a troll again? AWWWW I HATE WHEN THAT HAPPENS!!! :celebrate:
Image

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:23 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby octopoon » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:45 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:I mentioned Kordell going 13-3 and throwing over 100 balls to Hines to substantiate my point that Qbs have good stats BASED ON HOW GOOD OUR TEAM IS. If I said Kordell was better than Ben or even in his league then SHOW ME.


OK, right here ->

Scalaid6 wrote:What wr has Ben made better? We throw more NOW than we did when Kordell played. How does Kordell the BUM, throw 100 passes to Hines and Ben cant? How does Kordell go 13-3 and Ben CANT?


Where is the reference to "team" in this statement?

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Scalaid6 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:12 pm

"We throw more NOW than we did when Kordell played"
Who is "WE"?. Is "we" pertaining to you and I or THE STEELERS??
I think you have your answer sir.
Image

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:23 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby octopoon » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:35 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:"We throw more NOW than we did when Kordell played"
Who is "WE"?. Is "we" pertaining to you and I or THE STEELERS??
I think you have your answer sir.


Hines caught 100 passes with Tommy Maddox AND Kordell - FYI. The year was 2002. Also, in that year Tommy+Kordell threw 551 times, as compared to Ben's 442 last year.

This is just getting embarrassing for you.

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:23 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby octopoon » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:36 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:"We throw more NOW than we did when Kordell played"
Who is "WE"?. Is "we" pertaining to you and I or THE STEELERS??
I think you have your answer sir.


So, now you've just lied about the Steelers throwing more NOW than with Kordell.

I bid you good day, sir.

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Scalaid6 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:38 pm

octopoon wrote:
Scalaid6 wrote:"We throw more NOW than we did when Kordell played"
Who is "WE"?. Is "we" pertaining to you and I or THE STEELERS??
I think you have your answer sir.


Hines caught 100 passes with Tommy Maddox AND Kordell - FYI. The year was 2002. Also, in that year Tommy+Kordell threw 551 times, as compared to Ben's 442 last year.

This is just getting embarrassing for you.

My premise was that WE HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL WITH ALOT OF QBS DUE TO THE TALENT OF OUR TEAM. MADDOX +KORDELL = 2 BUMS!!!!
THANKS FOR SUBSTANTIATING MY POINT SIR. YOU TOOK THE BAIT, SO WHOS EMBARRASSED?
Image

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Scalaid6 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:39 pm

octopoon wrote:
Scalaid6 wrote:"We throw more NOW than we did when Kordell played"
Who is "WE"?. Is "we" pertaining to you and I or THE STEELERS??
I think you have your answer sir.


So, now you've just lied about the Steelers throwing more NOW than with Kordell.

I bid you good day, sir.

The season is not over sir, so to be continued. Lastly, the premise was "SHOW ME WHERE I LIED ON BEN"
Your desperation is showing sir.
Image

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:23 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby octopoon » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:43 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:
octopoon wrote:
Scalaid6 wrote:"We throw more NOW than we did when Kordell played"
Who is "WE"?. Is "we" pertaining to you and I or THE STEELERS??
I think you have your answer sir.


So, now you've just lied about the Steelers throwing more NOW than with Kordell.

I bid you good day, sir.

The season is not over sir, so to be continued. Lastly, the premise was "SHOW ME WHERE I LIED ON BEN"
Your desperation is showing sir.


I beg to differ - 2007 is in fact over

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:23 pm

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby octopoon » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:46 pm

Scalaid6 wrote:
octopoon wrote:
Scalaid6 wrote:"We throw more NOW than we did when Kordell played"
Who is "WE"?. Is "we" pertaining to you and I or THE STEELERS??
I think you have your answer sir.


Hines caught 100 passes with Tommy Maddox AND Kordell - FYI. The year was 2002. Also, in that year Tommy+Kordell threw 551 times, as compared to Ben's 442 last year.

This is just getting embarrassing for you.

My premise was that WE HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL WITH ALOT OF QBS DUE TO THE TALENT OF OUR TEAM. MADDOX +KORDELL = 2 BUMS!!!!
THANKS FOR SUBSTANTIATING MY POINT SIR. YOU TOOK THE BAIT, SO WHOS EMBARRASSED?


Your premise was that Ben couldn't be trusted with the game on the line - proven false.
Your premise was that we throw more now than we have in the past - also proven false.
Your premise was that we were successful with Maddox - false yet again.

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Ben v Eli

Postby Scalaid6 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:47 pm

Is "NOW" 2007 or is it 2008 sir??
Tammy Maddox went from selling insurance to a star qb for the Steelers. SUBSTANTIATION WE ARE A GOOD TEAM
Kordell was a BUM and processed information SLOW but we went 13-3 and he made the Pro Bowl in 01- SUBSTANTIATION THAT WE HAVE A GOOD TEAM.
Tammy gets hurt vs the Ravens and Ben comes in as a rookie and goes 15-1-SUBSTANTIATION THAT WE HAVE A GOOD TEAM.
How are the Pats doing without their starter? How bout the Cowboys?
The Steelers have a good team and if Ben goes down we will still be good with Byron at qb. Why-BECAUSE WE HAVEA GOOD TEAM. Thats my point
Image

PreviousNext

Return to Stillers Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Don't be stingy, share: