Board index » Game Threads Forum » stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
- thecountoncleats
- Seasoned Veteran
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:33 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
Scalaid6 wrote:thecountoncleats wrote:Scalaid6 wrote:Guess Arians didnt call that play ACCORDING TO YOU GUYS!
You're on the verge on embarrassing yourself. No one knows who called what.
They were in the huddle sir. Rewind your dvr after the Lindell White run. They were in the huddle. ARIANS called the play. I think you guys are embarrassed not me.
I have no idea what this means. I suspect you don't either.
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
thesteelhammer wrote:thecountoncleats wrote:Who was it posted about Davenport running straight ahead and kick offs and punt returns and not doing all that hot-dog bullshit like Holmes just did for net minus-five?
that was me. Lake agreed. Scalaid disagreed.
I didnt disagree. I said, his yardage was a result of GOOD BLOCKING. Thats what I said sir.
- thesteelhammer
- Stillers.com Team
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
thecountoncleats wrote:Timmons has played so-so in the middle, but he's blown up outside.
only farrior has more tackles today
- thecountoncleats
- Seasoned Veteran
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:33 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
thesteelhammer wrote:thecountoncleats wrote:Who was it posted about Davenport running straight ahead and kick offs and punt returns and not doing all that hot-dog bullshit like Holmes just did for net minus-five?
that was me. Lake agreed. Scalaid disagreed.
Then obviously you and Lake were right.
- thesteelhammer
- Stillers.com Team
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
Scalaid6 wrote:thesteelhammer wrote:thecountoncleats wrote:Who was it posted about Davenport running straight ahead and kick offs and punt returns and not doing all that hot-dog bullshit like Holmes just did for net minus-five?
that was me. Lake agreed. Scalaid disagreed.
I didnt disagree. I said, his yardage was a result of GOOD BLOCKING. Thats what I said sir.
you did say that, but you also said he was a bum
- StillDodger
- Grizzled Veteran
- Posts: 915
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 12:26 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
thecountoncleats wrote:Who was it posted about Davenport running straight ahead and kick offs and punt returns and not doing all that hot-dog bullshit like Holmes just did for net minus-five?
I agree about the kickoffs, disagree about the punts...... There is no cushion on punt returns, and the "hot dog" thing is often more effective. The kickoffs need a slasher that splits the seams......
Touchdown STILLERS!!!!!!
That one big play to Nate was the game changer.
Whenever Tom Brady loses, it's always someone else's fault.
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
It means CBS broke away for a update from the Titans game, Lindell whites long run. When they came back to Cincy the Steelers were in the huddle. Arians called the play. Like I said: When the Steelers do something good Ben gets the credit and Tomlin/Arians none. When they do something bad Tomlin/Arians get the blame and Ben none. Thanks for substantiating that statement guys!
- thecountoncleats
- Seasoned Veteran
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:33 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
thesteelhammer wrote:thecountoncleats wrote:Timmons has played so-so in the middle, but he's blown up outside.
only farrior has more tackles today
So what do you do with this embarrassment of riches? Harrison and Woodley are obviously great at OLB. I can't see moving either one of them inside. Rush two OLBs from one side? Harrison and Timmons?
It's a great problem to have.
- thesteelhammer
- Stillers.com Team
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
120 rushing yards for moore.
if our d can come up with a stop, time to sit him?
if our d can come up with a stop, time to sit him?
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
Great day Mewelde!!! Split carries between him and Willie so we have them both fresh come playoff time
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
Yes, Let Russell come in. We need Mewelde
- shawnlucas
- Grizzled Veteran
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 2:27 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
The Steelers should have had 31 points potentially in the first half. I'm not going to bemoan a thumping of the Bungs, but they let this team hang in way too long in this game.
They've got a tough stretch of schedule coming up. They need to stop leaving yards/points out there on the field.
They've got a tough stretch of schedule coming up. They need to stop leaving yards/points out there on the field.
- thecountoncleats
- Seasoned Veteran
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:33 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
StillDodger wrote:thecountoncleats wrote:Who was it posted about Davenport running straight ahead and kick offs and punt returns and not doing all that hot-dog bullshit like Holmes just did for net minus-five?
I agree about the kickoffs, disagree about the punts...... There is no cushion on punt returns, and the "hot dog" thing is often more effective. The kickoffs need a slasher that splits the seams......
Fair point. I still remember what that little cocksucker Eric Metcalf did to our beautiful Steelers.
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
If it wasnt for Tomlin, mewelde wouldnt be a Steeler. Can the coach get some props? COURSE NOT
Thought you guys said our line was bad?
Thought you guys said our line was bad?
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
thecountoncleats wrote:thesteelhammer wrote:thecountoncleats wrote:Who was it posted about Davenport running straight ahead and kick offs and punt returns and not doing all that hot-dog bullshit like Holmes just did for net minus-five?
that was me. Lake agreed. Scalaid disagreed.
Then obviously you and Lake were right.
With Mendy being out for the year now, does that mean that Najeh will likely be around for the rest of the year??
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
shawnlucas wrote:The Steelers should have had 31 points potentially in the first half. I'm not going to bemoan a thumping of the Bungs, but they let this team hang in way too long in this game.
They've got a tough stretch of schedule coming up. They need to stop leaving yards/points out there on the field.
They do have 31 points
- thesteelhammer
- Stillers.com Team
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
russell in.
leftwich in.
mcfadden headed to lockerroom.
leftwich in.
mcfadden headed to lockerroom.
- thecountoncleats
- Seasoned Veteran
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:33 pm
Re: stillers.com official game thread -Steelers vs. Bengals
Scalaid6 wrote:It means CBS broke away for a update from the Titans game, Lindell whites long run. When they came back to Cincy the Steelers were in the huddle. Arians called the play. Like I said: When the Steelers do something good Ben gets the credit and Tomlin/Arians none. When they do something bad Tomlin/Arians get the blame and Ben none. Thanks for substantiating that statement guys!
At the very least, this is an exaggeration. Learn to nuance your commentary if you want to be taken seriously.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests