Register

Board index » Stillers Talk » NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Anything and everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers
Stillers.com Team
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:45 pm

NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby StillMill » Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:33 am

1 of Roeth's sack vs. Clev was changed by the NFL to a reception by Ben, of all people. The ball hit a helmet and came back to him and he grabbed it.

Ben now is tied with Fast Willie Parker in receptions.....and he now has more receptions than the dynamic Mendenhall and Mewelde Moore (the "pass catching back", as you know) COMBINED. He also has more grabs than the #3 WR, and more than 2nd round rookie Limas Sweed.

All hail Bruce Arians.

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:04 pm

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby Nashsteeler » Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:46 am

Just haven't had to throw it around much in the first two games, so not many balls to go around. Time is coming when the guys you mentioned will have to step it up and be a part of the passing game. Just hope they are up to it, cause eventually we'll have to play offense without a lead. So far, the Steelers haven't been behind on the scoreboard at all, but that's sure to change soon.

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:30 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby The Truth » Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:49 am

Um, did you watch the game?

What kind of moron would throw the ball 30+ times in that shit weather vs Clev.

THATS the Truth behind running the ball twice as much as the pass. Plus the fact that our OLine came to play, and kicked Clevs ass all over the field.

Also, if you were paying attention vs the Texans. The game was over, what, mid-2nd quarter. They got a huge lead, and shut it down. I dont remember HOU really stopping our run game. Another reason why the O didnt throw alot.

So, that The Truth behind the lack of receptions there stat-boy. Its not Ariens.
Sorry to piss on your party.

Stillers.com Team
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby StillMill » Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:59 am

The Truth wrote:Um, did you watch the game?

What kind of moron would throw the ball 30+ times in that shit weather vs Clev.

We PASSED the ball, you stupid fuktard, versus Clev. And, given the weather, passes to the backs are much safer than downfield passes.

THATS the Truth behind running the ball twice as much as the pass. Plus the fact that our OLine came to play, and kicked Clevs ass all over the field.

Also, if you were paying attention vs the Texans. The game was over, what, mid-2nd quarter. They got a huge lead, and shut it down. I dont remember HOU really stopping our run game. Another reason why the O didnt throw alot.

So, that The Truth behind the lack of receptions there stat-boy. Its not Ariens.
Sorry to piss on your party.


We PASSED the ball, you stupid fuktard, versus Clev. And, given the weather, passes to the backs are much safer than downfield passes. There is only 1 TRUTH in this discussion, and it is that Arians has no clue and no concept on how to get the ball on shorts flares to a speedy, athletic duo like Parker and Mendy, aside from screen passes on 3d & 13.

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:30 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby The Truth » Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:37 am

"We PASSED the ball, you stupid fuktard, versus Clev. And, given the weather, passes to the backs are much safer than downfield passes. There is only 1 TRUTH in this discussion, and it is that Arians has no clue and no concept on how to get the ball on shorts flares to a speedy, athletic duo like Parker and Mendy, aside from screen passes on 3d & 13."

We passed the ball 19 times and ran 31 times.

There were only 12 (or 13 if the corrected stats are in the numbers) completions. How silly it may seem to you that we passed to our top 2 WRs and #1 TE. We only went deep twice.

We were not going to spread the ball around in the spread O/multi-WRs sets. Hence the lack of Nate catches (although he coulda had 2 catches that game - must have been Ariens fault for that too).

We protected our QB and played perfect O. We got 1st downs in the pass game vs that shitty Brown D.

Had it been a good weather day, we would have passed much more. And you would have seen more receptions.

Yea, lets play pussy ball, and spread it around to TEs and RBs for 5yard gainers. Then we can wear Patriot and Eagle uniforms to show off our new PussyMill Style of football.

I LOVE the fact that Ben goes for the plays down the field. Go for the throat. We didnt do it foolishly, like you say. We did if a little, which was perfect for the condidtions.


I know its hard to follow the Truth.

Stillers.com Team
User avatar
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 3:49 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby Nel » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:54 am

I know its hard to follow the Truth.


Tell us, does the other half of your split personality, "nebraskaSTEELER," whisper this in your ear or does he fight you?

:suahhbs:

Stillers.com Team
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby StillMill » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:57 am

False's version of the truth is patent bullshit.

For the record, I very much like throwing the ball DOWNFIELD. However, that doesn't negate the asinine stupidity of REFUSING to hit backs with DESIGNED flares. Arians REFUSED to do this last year (Parker - 23 grabs last year) and is refusing to do it thus far as well. If and when he does do this, this offense will be that much better. Of course, an idiot like yourself cannot understand any of this.

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:30 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby The Truth » Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:00 pm

How is he not doing it this year?

Its been 2 games.

We killed one team, and ran out the clock.

We played the 2nd game in a windstorm.

Idiot. You are soo knuckleheaded its funny.


And Nel, what the fuck does that have to do with anything?

Stillers.com Team
User avatar
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 3:49 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby Nel » Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:03 pm

The Truth wrote:And Nel, what the fuck does that have to do with anything?


It has everything to do with your claim to truth.

Only trolls, insane people and bullshit artists have multiple nicks.

Which one(s) are you?

:balloon:

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:30 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby The Truth » Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:10 pm

How do I have multiple nicknames.

I have read this site for years. Never posted. Just came in for a laugh to see what some of the 'idiots' were ranting.

Today, I decided to register, and level off the bullshit.

Plus, it has nothing to do with trolling, it has everything to do with showing how much of a farce Mill is at times. He is soo easy to prove wrong. Ballwashers like you get offended when someone takes another side than Mill.

Maybe you can lick his ass while your down there.

Stillers.com Team
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby StillMill » Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:45 pm

Nel,

Piece of shit Troll alert here with The False. No question about it.

Practice Squad
User avatar
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 3:45 pm

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby Zorro » Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:21 pm

Feel free to ban me after you delete this post. After all, what is the point of having the ability to post when my post just gets deleted? I guess when you highlight the failures here, people get a little sensative. I won't censor myself, so do whatever makes you feel better. You're a fraud.

Stillers.com Team
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby StillMill » Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:26 pm

Zorro wrote:Feel free to ban me after you delete this post. After all, what is the point of having the ability to post when my post just gets deleted? I guess when you highlight the failures here, people get a little sensative. I won't censor myself, so do whatever makes you feel better. You're a fraud.


We're not going back to the romper room playground we used to have.

Last warning, Zorro. Your call. Just let us know and we'll oblige.

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:30 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby The Truth » Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:38 pm

I love how you cannot admit or even consider others' points.

Thats okay you still have your 'followers'



So, when the Steelers go downfield this week, and attack the secondary with deep balls and big catches, are you going to bitch that the RBs didnt get catches?

Or here is your other plan...

If we dump off to RBs we wont get passes to Nate, and we will see the 'Any real NFL team passes to their #3 WR'

Nice way to set up your bitching for next weeks articles.

Stillers.com Team
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby StillMill » Fri Sep 19, 2008 3:08 pm

The Truth wrote:I love how you cannot admit or even consider others' points.

Thats okay you still have your 'followers'



So, when the Steelers go downfield this week, and attack the secondary with deep balls and big catches, are you going to bitch that the RBs didnt get catches?

Or here is your other plan...

If we dump off to RBs we wont get passes to Nate, and we will see the 'Any real NFL team passes to their #3 WR'

Nice way to set up your bitching for next weeks articles.


Once again, yer quibbling, rationalizing, and making up bullshit. I laid out the FACTS behind a very simple mismatch and you've showed up here pissing and moaning and quibbling.

Furthermore, we're not going back to the romper room playground we used to have.

Last warning, False. Your call. Just let us know and we'll oblige.

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:30 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby The Truth » Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:00 pm

"Once again, yer quibbling, rationalizing, and making up bullshit. I laid out the FACTS behind a very simple mismatch and you've showed up here pissing and moaning and quibbling.

Furthermore, we're not going back to the romper room playground we used to have.

Last warning, False. Your call. Just let us know and we'll oblige."


Im quibbing? Really now.

I am being pretty clear. You are playing both sides here. Throw to the Backs, throw to the #3 and #4 WRs....either way, you have an angle to bitch about.

And what the fuck is "Just let us know and we'll oblige"? My call? For what? Im disagreeing with you. Relax, you're acting like a wuss.

Threaten me all you want. I could care less. Im no troll Mill. I have met you. In KC, years ago, long ago I was nebraskaSTEELER on the site(s) Stiller.com has had. We actually shared a beer together. At the Stillers.com tailgate. You were wearing your #50 jersey (which is funny now that its Foote's #).

For some reason, you have gotten more and more bitter about this team. Some justified some not. I just dont think this FO and staff is as shitty as you point it out to be ALL THE TIME.

The Pittsburgh Steelers is one of the best organizations in professional sports. As fans, we should appreciate that SOMETIMES. You dont have to be an apologist, but sometimes you gotta open your mind a little, and maybe admit that others may have some solid input/analysis as well.

Stillers.com Team
User avatar
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 3:49 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby Nel » Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:16 pm

In KC, years ago, long ago I was nebraskaSTEELER on the site(s) Stiller.com has had


And also you have posted as nebraskaSTEELER on this message board, troll.

That's the truth.

:balloon:

Stillers.com Team
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby StillMill » Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:53 pm

Good call, Nel.

and for the record, this punk AIN'T the NebraskaSteeler that I met. I met Neb.Steeler......and that guy was not only asute, but he wasn't the shit-stirring, obnoxious a-hole that this imposter is.

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:30 am

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby The Truth » Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:53 pm

Nel,

When was the last time I posted as nebraskaSTEELER? I cant even remember when.

I couldnt get my password, and since it had been months, or even years (when I was a regular poster), I re-registered.


Again. What the fuck does that have to do with anything DICK. Im no troll, Im a fucking Steeler fan. You are a ballwashing stupid ass who cant come up with one original idea.



Mill, it was me. I was wearing a Betis Jersey. It was a Sunday game. You were wearing your Holmes #50 jersey. I asked you why you shit on JB soo much. You said he was a one trick pony. A one-dimensional back.

I have had nebSTEELER, and nebraskaSTEELER on Stillers.com...I even wrote a couple of articles long ago (4-5 years ago, as Still Pipe)

Stillers.com Team
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: NFL changes Roeth sack to a reception

Postby StillMill » Fri Sep 19, 2008 5:04 pm

Yer playing the role of a troll. You want to treat a mod like Nel, and posters here, with abusive language, you'll find a 1-way ticket out of here. You've been warned. your call.

Next

Return to Stillers Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Don't be stingy, share: