Register

Board index » Stillers Talk » 3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Anything and everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers
Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 10:23 am

3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Postby 1fourdathumb » Sun Nov 22, 2009 7:18 pm

I CAN DRAW UP A BETTER PLAY IN THE DIRT WITH A CROOKED STICK THAN A F'N SWEEP WITH MOORE YOU ASSHOLE. ALL THE PLAYS YOU HAVE AND YOU THOUGHT TO URSELF THIS SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT...A SWEEP WITH OUR SLOWEST BACK. I REALLY HOPE B.A. IS NOT THERE NEXT YEAR. BEN'S BEEN MAKING HIM LOOK GOOD FOR YEARS WITH HIS SCRAMBLING...OH AND BY THE WAY ASSHOLE, WHEN YOU'RE IN THE RED ZONE, AND YOU'RE SCRAMBLING FOR YOUR LIFE YET AGAIN, DON'T FORCE THE F'N BALL. THROW IT AWAY EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE. I CAN COUNT ON ABOUT THREE FINGERS THE AMOUNT OF TIMES YOU ACTUALLY THREW IT AWAY :supissed:

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:48 pm

Re: 3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Postby steelhitter » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:19 pm

Almost as dumb as the 3 and 2 on OT was the first down play -- a delayed flat pass by the second string QB who just came in the game with a cold arm. That was close to being pick six.

But, yes, sending your slowest back out on a deep pitch with only 2 yards to gain -- inexcusable!

Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 5:26 pm

Re: 3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Postby steelmann58 » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:22 pm

I can,t believe how that play was called and think for a sure that both ST coaches are gone.

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:24 am

Re: 3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Postby BigE » Sun Nov 22, 2009 11:07 pm

More apprehensible is the fact that Tomlin would stand by and let this bullshit play be called, grow some balls Mike!!!!!!!!!!!!

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:21 am

Re: 3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Postby IronCity__Man » Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:25 am

My first thought on the handoff was that it was going to be a halfback pass that Moore quickly decided against. Any one know if this was the call?

At least a halfback pass call would show some thinking. I don't agree with one of the posts above mine - that the flat pass was a bad call because of a cold arm - Charlie connected downfield before that.

But never mind that - I disagree with the 3rd and 2 call of Arians more. I take a Hines Ward curl in or out on 3rd and two any day. WTF.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:18 pm

Re: 3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Postby Jeemie » Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:18 am

I think Moore strung it wider than it was supposed to go, and got chased down backside. It had a slight chance of working if Moore cuts to the hole that I think he was supposed to cut to.

But it was a bad play at any rate. It was four-down territory. A perimeter play in that situation was stupid.

And there was no reason to take mendy out of the game. Give him the ball and let him take it straight up the middle- twice if need be.

Even if he doesn't make it, the FG is still an option (albeit not a pleasant one).

Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:54 pm

Re: 3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Postby stillcello » Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:09 pm

It was NOT a called halfback option, but as soon as the play started, I was hoping it was. Tomlin admitted they were trying for the sweep there, that's it.

I'm not a football expert, but when you are on the very cusp of field goal range, should you run a play the has a very low, if not the lowest percentage of not losing yardage? If Ben was in there, I would even consider a QB sneak quick snap, but with Batch, not a great option to get the first down. So you go to the next lowest percentage play, which would be Mendy up the middle...no stutter step....just hit the damn hole and don't lose yardage. It's not like we were facing the Ravens or Minnesota's run defense. Worst case, no gain to one yard gain, 51-52 yard FG attempt which is NO problem for Reed distance-wise. If getting the first down was the only goal, then OK run the sweep, but when are you the absolute limit of your kickers range (at least what they were willing to let him kick), then don't fuk around with some horizontal play with a slow RB that requires perfect blocking.... SO frustrating!

Hall of Famer
User avatar
Posts: 1823
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:38 pm

Re: 3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Postby PGHeaven » Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:51 pm

stillcello wrote:It was NOT a called halfback option, but as soon as the play started, I was hoping it was. Tomlin admitted they were trying for the sweep there, that's it.

I'm not a football expert, but when you are on the very cusp of field goal range, should you run a play the has a very low, if not the lowest percentage of not losing yardage? If Ben was in there, I would even consider a QB sneak quick snap, but with Batch, not a great option to get the first down. So you go to the next lowest percentage play, which would be Mendy up the middle...no stutter step....just hit the damn hole and don't lose yardage. It's not like we were facing the Ravens or Minnesota's run defense. Worst case, no gain to one yard gain, 51-52 yard FG attempt which is NO problem for Reed distance-wise. If getting the first down was the only goal, then OK run the sweep, but when are you the absolute limit of your kickers range (at least what they were willing to let him kick), then don't fuk around with some horizontal play with a slow RB that requires perfect blocking.... SO frustrating!


A FUCKING MEN!!

That play was the nadir of Arians play calling career. It broke every FUCKING RULE OF OFFENSIVE PLAY CALLING COMMON SENSE AND PROTOCOL

BA this is for you

:sufu: :sufu: :sufu: :sufu: :sufu: :sufu:

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:33 am

Re: 3RD AND TWO = F. U.

Postby Steelhope » Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:57 pm

BigE wrote:More apprehensible is the fact that Tomlin would stand by and let this bullshit play be called, grow some balls Mike!!!!!!!!!!!!



You must mean "reprehensible"...not "ap"

Return to Stillers Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Don't be stingy, share: