Register

Board index » Stillers Talk » to early to say running back controversy?

Anything and everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers
Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:55 pm

to early to say running back controversy?

Postby Fire Arians » Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:50 pm

as soon as willie is healthy again does this mean mendenhall will be back on the bench? or will we see more of a 2 headed monster? or mendenhall winning the position? thoughts?

dude was a monster tonight and led the entire nfl in week 4 rushing. i'd be totally pissed off about the near-collapse in the 4th quarter, but have to be happy with this kid right now

from what I've seen, mendenhall is clearly better at getting yards after contact than parker, and is more of a big play threat

Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:36 am

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby lancastill » Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:55 pm

mendenhall has done everything and more in one game than willie has the whole season. he can catch in the flats, he can run between the tackles and he can get around the tackles and he can get long runs, even when hes tackled behind the line he gets more yardage than willie. i can never forget the 75 yd run in sb 40 and that game with browns, i cant remember his stats right now, but he hasnt had a great game like that in awhile. if im wrong let me know and ill stand corrected, but im just all go for mendenhall rite now

Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 10:23 am

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby 1fourdathumb » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:02 am

ALSO THE LINE BLOCKED VERY WELL FOR SOME REASON TODAY AND MENDY HIT THE HOLES LIKE A BAT OUT OF HELL. YOU DON'T TAKE HIM OUT IMO, WHEN WILLIE IS HEALTHY. LOVED TO SEE LEGURSKY AT THE GOAL LINE...REMINDED ME OF A BABY FRIDGE....ASIDE FROM THE D-FENSE TAKING A HUGE DUMP IN THE FOURTH QUARTER, I THOUGHT THE PLAY CALLING WAS A NICE MIX OF RUN AND PASS...AND WHAT DO YOU KNOW...A HALF BACK PASS...WELL KISS MY GRITZ :surockin:

Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:52 pm

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby StillLifer » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:05 am

I've always said that Parker was too soft to get any yardage inside without a good block. He just bounces off defenders. His best bet nowadays is getting a good angle and running outside. Even then, if he hesitates, he doesn't get far enough ahead for his speed to really kick in. Say what you want about Bettis, but at least he could gain a couple just by falling forward.

I think Mendy gives us more strength in the RB position considering the lousy run blocking from our OL. I know WP is fast, but Mendy is, too. Sorry to Willie, but if I'd have the chance, I would have made Mendy our #1 by now.

Moore has done fairly well. Logan looks like he could be our Sproles (he just needs a bit better judgement- more experience). I don't know what it is that makes Logan look so much better than Parker. Maybe he's getting more room to run on ST than Parker would with a regular offensive play? Or maybe Logan reads the holes better than Parker? I've just been unimpressed with Parker all of last season and the games so far this year have reinforced that feeling.

Speaking of picking up a couple, I feel like Ben would be better off after scrambling from a missed sack and just running for a few (instead of throwing it away or making those terrible risky tosses). I mean, if he's going to be running for his life, he may as well be running toward the first down marker. Am I the only one that's seeing this?

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:24 am

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby BigE » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:14 am

Mendy is a much better blocker and pass catcher than Willie. This is fwp's last year

Seasoned Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:05 am

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby SteelTank » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:16 am

There's a reason why Parker didn't start in college... He just wasn't that good at cutting and seeing the holes. Then again, there's a reason why Park was a good NFL RB - he's got plenty of speed.

That is all he has however.

Mendy could be the real deal and should be given every opportunity to prove that he is this year.

Good luck in your travels Willie.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 2:00 pm

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby deltadweller » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:12 am

If Mendy isn't the answer, Parker still isn't the answer. He's a one trick poney. He's fast. Maybe we could trade him to the Raiders for a high pick. ;) Rashard ran against a poor defensive team that played tonight, but you could see the vision and leg drive that Parker doesn't have. Thanks Willie for being an able fill in for a few years, and the memories.

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:49 am

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby 7.62x39 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:02 am

Parker should be 3rd on the depth chart. The offense is much more effective with Mendy or Moore in there. I'm not sure what Tomlin is thinking if he sticks with Parker when he's healthy again.

Seasoned Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:59 pm

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby UncleDick » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:02 am

Granted it was just one game vs a Charger D without Jamal Williams, but the Oline looked like we started 5 different people out there.

I think once they saw Mendy running hard they wanted to block and played harder, it shouldnt be that way but hell it does happen. They see a guy fighting for yards and hitting the holes hard and they give a little extra.


As for who the starting running back will be, Im not a fan of someone playing 2 series then another player playing 1. Stick a guy in there, let him bang and come out when you are gassed. No 12 carries for one guy and 9 for another, put a horse in there and ride him. If the Chargers D was not gassed in the 4th we may have lost, and Mendy did that.

Can Mendy do that every game?? Probably not, but willie as much as i hate to say it, cant do it at all.

Mewelde = Clutch!

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:57 pm

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby oldschoolhunkie » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:38 am

There's a reason why Parker didn't start in college... He just wasn't that good at cutting and seeing the holes. Then again, there's a reason why Park was a good NFL RB - he's got plenty of speed.


This is absurd. Who cares what he did or did not do in college.. how soon you all forget.. look how many yards FWP has gained as a stiller.

having said that I totally think it is time to move Mendy in, but don't say "oh, willie was never that good. he didn't even star tin college." He gained some serious yardage for this team and was crucial in two SB runs. show some gratitude, fools!

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 592
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:01 am

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby Pump-N-Iron » Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:09 am

UncleDick wrote:I think once they saw Mendy running hard they wanted to block and played harder, it shouldnt be that way but hell it does happen. They see a guy fighting for yards and hitting the holes hard and they give a little extra.

As much as everyone will deny it, this does happen in the NFL for RBs and QBs. Every O-Line blocks better for those they perceive to be worthy. Maybe they are tired of watching FWP go down when the LB's fingernail accidentally gets caught on Willie's shoe lace. Don't get me wrong, I like FWP, but I think his days as the starter are numbered.
BTW... did anyone catch the look on his face every time the cameras flashed to him on the sidelines? Sure he looked happy for the team, but he knew that every big run by Mendy was a dagger in his chest. I felt kinda bad for him in a small way.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:21 am

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby IronCity__Man » Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:44 am

Charger's run D is as soft as they come. FWP had his best games last year against the Chargers. Mendenhall got embarassed last week to try really hard. I keep likening Mendy to Chris Benson. It took Benson being sent to Cinci before he got the picture.

Mendenhall excelled in college because Illinois ran the spread offense. He is still best in that scheme because he is not a bruiser and runs too high.

Mendenhall should do well if they keep it spread out.

Practice Squad
User avatar
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:29 am
Location: Pittsburgh - South Hills

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby number1steelerfan » Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:45 pm

FWP is statistically the third best RB in Steelers history... Yinz fans that want to throw him under the Bus are crazy 'n at... I can't wait for the 1-2 punch when Fast and Delicious are both healthy behind this blossoming O-line. Bring on the last 3/4 of the season, I can't wait!

Stillers.com Team
User avatar
Posts: 5285
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby thesteelhammer » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:26 pm

No controversy.
We use them both this season when they are both healthy.
When they aren't, we are lucky to have the other.

If Mendy can keep up like last night, FWP is gone after this season.
no controversy

Seasoned Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:30 am

Re: to early to say running back controversy?

Postby HereWeGo » Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:23 am

willie was gone after this season before the season started.

rashard has come to play, yall. glad we still have moore in reserve and redman on the PS.

i woulda traded him in the off-season.

Return to Stillers Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Don't be stingy, share: