View topic - Heres my take on the game.

by **TheStillerWay86** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:38 am

My main keys to how we can further show that cincy doesnt have the jailbait to compete with us.

1. Stop Odom- He has 5 sacks in two games for the Bungholios - Last time i checked thats christ on wheels for a DE. Now if we can contain him to maybe just one and a few pressures it would help out to hold off the backers, if Hines doesnt break all their jaws within the first drive :subngtowl:

2. Run the Fucking football- We run, we win. Hines tears up the Bengals D basically all the time, so why not be balanced?

3. Stop the long ball - If we can keep Henry (who if he gets behind Gay,which will probably happen because Gay will probably be staring at his schlonganker, will burn us for 60+) in check and keep him under 60-75 yards we can focus on dink-and-dick stuff and molest their pathetic running game more than what we would normally.

4. Woodley... STEP THE FUCK UP AND QUIT READING THE PAPER!- If wood gets off the chronic he and James can single-handedly win this game for us. Palmer isnt going to fucking run and he CANT fucking run.

5. No Drops=Ward,Holmes and Heath Bar all 65 yds+ - Hopefully if our line can block for a good majority we can get the ball distributed more evenly, i really want to see what Wallace can do, the last two games some minor thing has fucked up a big play for him. Officially call it- Sweeds injury is costing him valuable playing time, Mikes definately stepped up. As for Holmes - No drops, i doubt its raining in cincy anyway but he will have a comeback game. Wards getting 80+ and a touch at least. Its just about guarenteed.

by **kazkal** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:54 am

TheStillerWay86 wrote:My main keys to how we can further show that cincy doesnt have the jailbait to compete with us.

1. Stop Odom- He has 5 sacks in two games for the Bungholios - Last time i checked thats christ on wheels for a DE. Now if we can contain him to maybe just one and a few pressures it would help out to hold off the backers, if Hines doesnt break all their jaws within the first drive

2. Run the Fucking football- We run, we win. Hines tears up the Bengals D basically all the time, so why not be balanced?

3. Stop the long ball - If we can keep Henry (who if he gets behind Gay,which will probably happen because Gay will probably be staring at his schlonganker, will burn us for 60+) in check and keep him under 60-75 yards we can focus on dink-and-dick stuff and molest their pathetic running game more than what we would normally.

4. Woodley... STEP THE FUCK UP AND QUIT READING THE PAPER!- If wood gets off the chronic he and James can single-handedly win this game for us. Palmer isnt going to fucking run and he CANT fucking run.

5. No Drops=Ward,Holmes and Heath Bar all 65 yds+ - Hopefully if our line can block for a good majority we can get the ball distributed more evenly, i really want to see what Wallace can do, the last two games some minor thing has fucked up a big play for him. Officially call it- Sweeds injury is costing him valuable playing time, Mikes definately stepped up. As for Holmes - No drops, i doubt its raining in cincy anyway but he will have a comeback game. Wards getting 80+ and a touch at least. Its just about guarenteed.

1-I think Double teaming and focusing Odom would be mistake, because it would mean less focus on Geathers & MJ who are much faster then Odom....If Steelers go out of their way to stop Odom I think Geathers and Johnson have very good days...

2-No Doubt Steelers are meant to run the ball and stop the Run.... why always hate playing you guys

3-True that one bengals strengths is fact they have three good wide receivers who can all go down the field for the deep ball...

4.)Yup and he's facing Collins so if hes going step it up this should be game since Collins isn't anything special

5.)Feel ya on drops,its always sad thing to see wide open receiver drop the ball...

by **TheStillerWay86** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:57 am

kazkal wrote:
TheStillerWay86 wrote:My main keys to how we can further show that cincy doesnt have the jailbait to compete with us.

1. Stop Odom- He has 5 sacks in two games for the Bungholios - Last time i checked thats christ on wheels for a DE. Now if we can contain him to maybe just one and a few pressures it would help out to hold off the backers, if Hines doesnt break all their jaws within the first drive

2. Run the Fucking football- We run, we win. Hines tears up the Bengals D basically all the time, so why not be balanced?

3. Stop the long ball - If we can keep Henry (who if he gets behind Gay,which will probably happen because Gay will probably be staring at his schlonganker, will burn us for 60+) in check and keep him under 60-75 yards we can focus on dink-and-dick stuff and molest their pathetic running game more than what we would normally.

4. Woodley... STEP THE FUCK UP AND QUIT READING THE PAPER!- If wood gets off the chronic he and James can single-handedly win this game for us. Palmer isnt going to fucking run and he CANT fucking run.

5. No Drops=Ward,Holmes and Heath Bar all 65 yds+ - Hopefully if our line can block for a good majority we can get the ball distributed more evenly, i really want to see what Wallace can do, the last two games some minor thing has fucked up a big play for him. Officially call it- Sweeds injury is costing him valuable playing time, Mikes definately stepped up. As for Holmes - No drops, i doubt its raining in cincy anyway but he will have a comeback game. Wards getting 80+ and a touch at least. Its just about guarenteed.

1-I think Double teaming and focusing Odom would be mistake, because it would mean less focus on Geathers & MJ who are much faster then Odom....If Steelers go out of their way to stop Odom I think Geathers and Johnson have very good days...

2-No Doubt Steelers are meant to run the ball and stop the Run.... why always hate playing you guys

3-True that one bengals strengths is fact they have three good wide receivers who can all go down the field for the deep ball...

4.)Yup and he's facing Collins so if hes going step it up this should be game since Collins isn't anything special

5.)Feel ya on drops,its always sad thing to see wide open receiver drop the ball...

I want your opinion my brotheren. Fight between Chadcoocho Negro with his grill used as brass knuckles vs Hines in a fight? It may happen if a beatdown occurs :subngtowl:

by **kazkal** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:01 am

If Chad is using his grill as a weapon does that mean Hines gets to use his helmet? ^_^

by **TheStillerWay86** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:13 am

kazkal wrote:If Chad is using his grill as a weapon does that mean Hines gets to use his helmet? ^_^

No bullshit. Hines is a fucking monster. Besides the fact of numbers his character to his team,players and the way he lives his life is a tribute nowadays in football. Thats why he will be in the Hall of Fame and not 85. Hines doesnt need to talk shit and twitter, his play speaks for itself. INHO i doubt ocho wouldve competed and tried as hard as Hines did comming off a injury like he had to before SB 43, even though his 2 recs/43yds werent like his MVP proformance in 40, his presence DEMANDED arizona to respect him and not just float coverage on him. Without Ward, some of Tone's plays in the first half might have eventually drawed double coverage on him. But that would have left Ward or Miller at an advantage. Those motherfuckers picked their posion.

And about Rivers: Hes gonna be getting a fuck load of hits cause if you dont rememeber Corey Ivy learned that Sweed can hit. Hines made this team "Wideout U".

by **kazkal** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:20 am

Ya when Bengals play steelers thing I hope for most is coming out of the game injury free,,,Just happy that Bengals are finally getting some hitters on Defense something they've been lacking for a while.

by **TheStillerWay86** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:27 am

kazkal wrote:Ya when Bengals play steelers thing I hope for most is coming out of the game injury free,,,Just happy that Bengals are finally getting some hitters on Defense something they've been lacking for a while.

Yep. The biggest hit youns had last year was "The crack heard around the Tri-State area".

I honestly think because of Sweeds injury that Mike Wallace should and needs to get more chances, the long ball can be big for us here. I wasnt and am still not convinced Williams is a good safety at all. :supimpin:

by **kazkal** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:35 am

Well I think Roy is serviceable but he'll defiantly give up his fair share of big plays by seasons end...
But I see him to make more plays then our past SS's and Lay more wood....Atleast I hope ^_^

by **TheStillerWay86** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:45 am

kazkal wrote:Well I think Roy is serviceable but he'll defiantly give up his fair share of big plays by seasons end...
But I see him to make more plays then our past SS's and Lay more wood....Atleast I hope ^_^

Hes better than what ya had. How about KaCunta Carter and Donte Stallworth as your safteys?

Umh Hell Fucking Yes.

by **Pump-N-Iron** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:25 am

TheStillerWay86 wrote:1. Stop Odom- He has 5 sacks in two games for the Bungholios

Actually, watch the tape on this guy against GB... he had 5 sacks in that game (7 for the season). Yes, he is a solid pass rushing end, but he's no Deacon Jones. The Fudge Packers lost their starting LT on Offense and then, assigned a career back-up, with virtually no experience to SOLO block him all game long. No help from a TE, no chips from a RB. Hell, I think Bruce Davis could have had 3 sacks with that match up.

The point here is Maxi-Pad needs to move his lethargic feet and keep this guy in front of him.

by **thesteelhammer** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:31 am

protecting Ben is always the top priority, and always one of our biggest problems regardless of who the other teams pass-rushers are.

by **TheStillerWay86** » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:04 pm

Pump-N-Iron wrote:
TheStillerWay86 wrote:1. Stop Odom- He has 5 sacks in two games for the Bungholios

Actually, watch the tape on this guy against GB... he had 5 sacks in that game (7 for the season). Yes, he is a solid pass rushing end, but he's no Deacon Jones. The Fudge Packers lost their starting LT on Offense and then, assigned a career back-up, with virtually no experience to SOLO block him all game long. No help from a TE, no chips from a RB. Hell, I think Bruce Davis could have had 3 sacks with that match up.

The point here is Maxi-Pad needs to move his lethargic feet and keep this guy in front of him.

My fault on the faulty numbers Pump but thank you. 5 in a game? Holy fuck... Dont worry, he will commit a hainous murder in the upcomming hours.

View topic - Heres my take on the game.

Board index » Stillers Talk » Heres my take on the game.

Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Re: Heres my take on the game.

Who is online