Register

Board index » Stillers Talk » "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Anything and everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers
Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:43 pm

"No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby Crucible-steel-kid » Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:16 pm

LINK:

http://stats.pennlive.com/fb/story.asp? ... 23&src=NFL

Yeah, that's great, but it still isn't gonna be a walk in the park for them either.
CRUCIBLE STEEL AND SPECIALTY ALLOYS DIVISION. COLT INDUSTRIES. VESUVIUS RESEARCH MIDLAND PENNSYLVANIA.

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:23 pm

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby SteelPower » Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:35 pm

Win a game and Bungles think their world beaters say who dey The Bungles

Seasoned Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:57 pm

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby frankensmith91 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:41 am

he shouldnt be too delighted, timmons will be healthy for this game, bad news for him

Practice Squad
User avatar
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby kazkal » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:46 am

Acourse he is,Troy always has big games vs carson
"Game recognize game, and you lookin’ kinda weak "-Riley Freeman

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:32 pm
Location: Mckeesport, Pennsylvania

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby TheStillerWay86 » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:00 am

kazkal wrote:Acourse he is,Troy always has big games vs carson


This would make Ziggy's career- Pull a KEMO and the whole Stiller Nation will envy you.

Practice Squad
User avatar
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby kazkal » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:09 am

TheStillerWay86 wrote:
kazkal wrote:Acourse he is,Troy always has big games vs carson


This would make Ziggy's career- Pull a KEMO and the whole Stiller Nation will envy you.


Makes me wonder why steeler nation feels Carson needs to be kimo'd again unless their scared this week ;)...
Just kidding ^_^
"Game recognize game, and you lookin’ kinda weak "-Riley Freeman

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:32 pm
Location: Mckeesport, Pennsylvania

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby TheStillerWay86 » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:24 am

kazkal wrote:
TheStillerWay86 wrote:
kazkal wrote:Acourse he is,Troy always has big games vs carson


This would make Ziggy's career- Pull a KEMO and the whole Stiller Nation will envy you.


Makes me wonder why steeler nation feels Carson needs to be kimo'd again unless their scared this week ;)...
Just kidding ^_^


Soon enough ill be the one laughing when i remind you how Tonio ruined your 07 season and playoff hopes. Our 8-8 record wasnt relevant that day, that victory was our super bowl..

Hines' murdering stats for later today- 5-8: 76-110 yds. At least a touch.
Holmes' blunt smoking: 4-7: 60-90, hopefully NO drops and a touch, if not two. If he gets two we win.


If Miller can also get open your Linebackers will soon be looking for the Browns bus to see if they can hop from shit to dung.

Practice Squad
User avatar
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby kazkal » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:31 am

I'm just smiling because i'm friendly person nothing against the steelers...myself I think one of Widereceivers will have 100+ yard game but I'd say Miller ends up being your guys offensive MVP if you win since Rey is still quite new to SLB and i'm sure miller will have a few big catches.



PS,I'm off for the night good luck to you guys and I'll stop by after game even if we lose ^_^
"Game recognize game, and you lookin’ kinda weak "-Riley Freeman

Hall of Famer
User avatar
Posts: 1823
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:38 pm

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby PGHeaven » Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:54 am

The Bungals - I assure you - are up for this game. But if we defeat them today in the playpen, they will deflate quicker than a rubber in Long Beach. I mean they will self fucking destruct and Chad Ochocinco will be talking trade and Palmer will be considering retirement along with Marvin Lewis. LOL!!

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:43 pm

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby Crucible-steel-kid » Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:25 pm

My problem with "MUCHO STINKO" is that his trash talk is meaningless-I mean he never backs it up with any tangible evidence on the field. I was discussing him with my friend lastnight until the wee hours, and he said that he was razzing Rod Woodson 0and Deion Sanders by saying that had they played now when he is playing, he Quote "would have schooled them on how to cover receivers the right way"... He is a total buffoon.

I see Palmer asking to get traded ANYWHERE just to get outta Cincy...
CRUCIBLE STEEL AND SPECIALTY ALLOYS DIVISION. COLT INDUSTRIES. VESUVIUS RESEARCH MIDLAND PENNSYLVANIA.

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:32 pm
Location: Mckeesport, Pennsylvania

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby TheStillerWay86 » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:02 pm

Crucible-steel-kid wrote:My problem with "MUCHO STINKO" is that his trash talk is meaningless-I mean he never backs it up with any tangible evidence on the field. I was discussing him with my friend lastnight until the wee hours, and he said that he was razzing Rod Woodson 0and Deion Sanders by saying that had they played now when he is playing, he Quote "would have schooled them on how to cover receivers the right way"... He is a total buffoon.

I see Palmer asking to get traded ANYWHERE just to get outta Cincy...


Really when Black Johnson has been with Cincy hes acting like T.O. in a sense- all for one. In the end i DOUBT he really cares what the team does as long as he is producing.

Hines for H.O.F. I hope Clark fucking annihilates him, then Hines annihilates Rivers again, then Jamie taking out half their bench.

Thoughts? :sucope:

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:43 pm

Re: "No Polamalu? Bengals' Palmer certainly delighted"

Postby Crucible-steel-kid » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:04 pm

They're watching for Ward due to the "Hines Ward" rule. Just like the other thread posted here, I often ask myself "is this really football anymore?".

On a less philosophical level, if they don't foul up they should carry the field if Carter can keep up with his coverages and the linebackers can get in Palmers' face. JMHO...
CRUCIBLE STEEL AND SPECIALTY ALLOYS DIVISION. COLT INDUSTRIES. VESUVIUS RESEARCH MIDLAND PENNSYLVANIA.

Return to Stillers Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Don't be stingy, share: