Board index » Stillers Talk » New Article: Power Rankings (week 5)
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
New Article: Power Rankings (week 5)
Power Rankings (week 5) has been posted by Steel Haven at Stillers.com.
Re: New Article: Power Rankings (week 5)
HELLO!
Moving us from 7th to 4th after Monday's performance, you're kidding. Now with all the injuries and the Jags at home, we'll be lucky to be top 10 next week.
Only success to this season will be to win all 6 games in our division and make the playoffs.
Moving us from 7th to 4th after Monday's performance, you're kidding. Now with all the injuries and the Jags at home, we'll be lucky to be top 10 next week.
Only success to this season will be to win all 6 games in our division and make the playoffs.
Re: New Article: Power Rankings (week 5)
we haven't proven much to be the #4 spot yet. especially after losing willie and mendenhall i think we drop some spots unless we can prove we can dominate when our running game isn't working
- lloydrules
- Grizzled Veteran
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:30 pm
Re: New Article: Power Rankings (week 5)
trenches wrote:http://www.stillers.com/articles/2294.aspx has been posted by Steel Haven at Stillers.com.
This guy is 100% stoned. Steelers at 4? Total delusion. Barely beat horrid Browns. Lose to Philly and it wasn't as close as the score. Take every last effort and tons of body blows to beat Balt. in OT, and they are the 4th best team in the NFL? Nonsense.
And, the Bills are decent, but don't let their record fool you.
Dallas lost to Skins but everyone knows they are still better.
SD is 2-2 but will end up being one of the best teams.
This is like the ranking of college teams in early Sept: erroneous.
Re: New Article: Power Rankings (week 5)
El Nino wrote:we haven't proven much to be the #4 spot yet. especially after losing willie and mendenhall i think we drop some spots unless we can prove we can dominate when our running game isn't working
Davenport and Russel aren't too bad of a running game.
- lloydrules
- Grizzled Veteran
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:30 pm
Re: New Article: Power Rankings (week 5)
rick723 wrote:El Nino wrote:we haven't proven much to be the #4 spot yet. especially after losing willie and mendenhall i think we drop some spots unless we can prove we can dominate when our running game isn't working
Davenport and Russel aren't too bad of a running game.
Davenport sucks when he is in shape. He most certainly won't be any where near game shape and will be spent in 2 carries. Russel we have no clue about, other than he wasn't good enough to make the final 53.
- SteelCityFan
- Seasoned Veteran
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:57 pm
Re: New Article: Power Rankings (week 5)
lloydrules wrote:trenches wrote:http://www.stillers.com/articles/2294.aspx has been posted by Steel Haven at Stillers.com.
This guy is 100% stoned. Steelers at 4? Total delusion. Barely beat horrid Browns. Lose to Philly and it wasn't as close as the score. Take every last effort and tons of body blows to beat Balt. in OT, and they are the 4th best team in the NFL? Nonsense.
And, the Bills are decent, but don't let their record fool you.
Dallas lost to Skins but everyone knows they are still better.
SD is 2-2 but will end up being one of the best teams.
This is like the ranking of college teams in early Sept: erroneous.
Spot on
Re: New Article: Power Rankings (week 5)
McLovin agrees...Steelers too high even if the power rankings are done in fun you can't be a Homer when analyzing Steelers against rest of the league. All teams have issues but I can't think of many top 10 calibur teams that have an OL and an OC as poor as ours. All teams have injuries so can't use that as excuse. That said, no team hit harder with injuries than the mighty Chargers...they need to be higher. Merriman sorely missed on the defense with Jamal Williams slow to recover from knee surgery.
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests