Register

Board index » Stillers Talk » Doubts about Mendenhall

Anything and everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers
Stillers.com Team
User avatar
Posts: 5285
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm

Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby thesteelhammer » Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:35 pm

The mainstream press is starting to wonder, what many of us have been thinking for a while.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/08/15/steelers.mendenhall.ap/index.html?eref=si_nfl

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:43 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby Crucible-steel-kid » Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:00 pm

I HOPE THIS GUY PANS OUT. THE LAST THING WE NEED IS TO BURN A ROSTER SPOT FOR ANOTHER BUST DRAFT PICK...
CRUCIBLE STEEL AND SPECIALTY ALLOYS DIVISION. COLT INDUSTRIES. VESUVIUS RESEARCH MIDLAND PENNSYLVANIA.

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:57 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby SteelCityFan » Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:59 pm

Yikes. This guy can't suck, that's all there is to it. I think Tomlin will put his boot far enough up Mendy's ass so that we will see results. At least that's what I'm hoping.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:13 am

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby Coke Oven » Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:31 am

Name me one great back who didn't show signs that he was gonna be a good one the first time he set foot on the field. Unlike quarterbacks and receivers great backs look the part from the get go. I'm not seeing that from Mendenhall, are you?

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:21 am

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby IronCity__Man » Tue Aug 18, 2009 9:06 am

Mendy is going to tear it up when given the chance. The collective Steelers community are assessing his potential on 19 carrries and a whole lot of press. If we use that assessment for other players then Joe Burnett is going to be a hall of famer because he made some interceptions in practice and a preseason game. I still think Mendy can slash into a hole better than any other back we have. Perhaps he is thinking a bit too much right now but he isn't going to get any running room in preseason so we won't know anything until later. I still think FWP is the starter no matter what. We need FWP bounce to the outside because of our poor interior line blocking.

It is all about the 0-line. Denver churns out presumably great running backs because of their o-line ability and probably their scheme.

Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:19 am

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby Witchblade » Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:27 pm

Coke Oven wrote:Name me one great back who didn't show signs that he was gonna be a good one the first time he set foot on the field. Unlike quarterbacks and receivers great backs look the part from the get go. I'm not seeing that from Mendenhall, are you?



That fact that you don't like him is a pretty good indication to the rest of that he is going to be just fine.
A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.
P. J. O'Rourke (1947 - )

Greenhorned Rookie
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:26 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby punum123 » Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:49 pm

I think its a bit early to say he's just avg.

However, if he doesn't watch his back, Redmen will be eating his lunch.

Let the competition begin!

:supimpin:

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:34 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby PSUPERCY » Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:17 pm

Witchblade wrote:
Coke Oven wrote:Name me one great back who didn't show signs that he was gonna be a good one the first time he set foot on the field. Unlike quarterbacks and receivers great backs look the part from the get go. I'm not seeing that from Mendenhall, are you?



That fact that you don't like him is a pretty good indication to the rest of that he is going to be just fine.


CokeOven may be right. I can't think of even one great RB who hadn't flashed something by now. Someone please name one. I can't. Hell, even Carey Davis flashed in the 07 preseason. Carey Davis.

Greenhorned Rookie
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:23 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby Still CA Still » Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:26 pm

Easy , Men. There is not enough evidence of anything-either way-to annoint or dismiss Mendy. Expecting flashes of brilliance at this time of the season and at this stage of the O-line's development is crazy. Keep your powder dry and let's see what unfolds but don't be surprised if some "big name" back on the B&G is packaged off for picks before the season begins.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:13 am

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby Coke Oven » Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:40 pm

"That fact that you don't like him is a pretty good indication to the rest of that he is going to be just fine."

I don't like you either. I suppose that means that you too will be just fine in spite of the fact that you're so fucked up.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:21 am

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby IronCity__Man » Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:51 pm

The only "very good" back that I can think of is a late bloomer is Tiki Barber. Season rush values of his first four years were 511,166,258,1006, then ended with a string of 1500+ seasons. Giants didn't need him to win a superbowl either.

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:23 am

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby LambertoCincoOcho » Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:23 pm

Walter Payton ran for less than a thousand his rookie year. OJ Simpson was almost moved to WR early in his career. All three are in the Hall Of Fame.

1975 Walter Payton 196-679 7 TD 3.5 avg.
1971 John Riggins 180-769 1 TD 4.3 avg.
1969 OJ Simpson 181-697 2 TD 3.9 avg.

One thing I have noticed is that the first tackler usually brings him down. The team will be patient with him because of their investment. He will stick around at least as long as Jamain Stephens.

Stillers.com Team
User avatar
Posts: 5285
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby thesteelhammer » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:16 pm

Mentioning Mendy in the same breath as sweetness, Juice, or Riggins is crazy talk.
He isn't them, and never will be.

What he is right now is OVER-PAID

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:23 am

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby LambertoCincoOcho » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:39 pm

the point is a subpar rookie year doesn't always doom a RB to a failed career dumbass :sushootem:

Stillers.com Team
User avatar
Posts: 5285
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby thesteelhammer » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:58 pm

Point is those guys are the exception. It's much more likely he'll be a average to good or even a bust than a HOF RB - dumb ass :sushootem:

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby mckeesrockstheburg » Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Tough to run when you're hit 2 or 3 times before you get to the L.O.S. ( sometimes even before he got the handoff!)

Arians and his run formations with 2 TE's and Hines in tight make for crowded line and predicability. Defense with 8 in the box is tough to beat, no matter who you are. A little creativity would break the box down and get backers off the line and thinking.

Memo to Bruce: You are allowed to fake out the oppenent. Hit wallace or Sweed or Tone with crossing or quick outs (aka Welker anyone?). Like 'em or not, how many times have you seen Pats & Faulk run for 1st down off 3rd & 5 or more because they have taken backers off the L.O.S.? Can't stand 'em but their system works and I believe our weapons are better than theirs. Throw in Ben as a "scrambler" and we clean their clocks if our offense had more than 5 plays.

Gosh, Arians is a joke.

Stillers.com Team
User avatar
Posts: 5285
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby thesteelhammer » Tue Aug 18, 2009 8:20 pm

mckeesrockstheburg wrote:Tough to run when you're hit 2 or 3 times before you get to the L.O.S. ( sometimes even before he got the handoff!)

Arians and his run formations with 2 TE's and Hines in tight make for crowded line and predicability. Defense with 8 in the box is tough to beat, no matter who you are. A little creativity would break the box down and get backers off the line and thinking.

Memo to Bruce: You are allowed to fake out the oppenent. Hit wallace or Sweed or Tone with crossing or quick outs (aka Welker anyone?). Like 'em or not, how many times have you seen Pats & Faulk run for 1st down off 3rd & 5 or more because they have taken backers off the L.O.S.? Can't stand 'em but their system works and I believe our weapons are better than theirs. Throw in Ben as a "scrambler" and we clean their clocks if our offense had more than 5 plays.

Gosh, Arians is a joke.


Excellent points.
I am by no means throwing the towel in on this kid.
I'm just saying, he ain't a HOF running back.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:21 am

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby IronCity__Man » Wed Aug 19, 2009 9:15 am

I wish the Steelers would abandon this single back crap. I am willing to bet the Steelers have a greater avg. rushing play with a fullback lead. This experiment has gone down a bad path and we don't even have a blocking fullback on the roster. I still can't determine what Carey Davis's role is on this team. He is not a blocking fullback (maybe on the pass), not a goal-line plunge back, and not a 3rd down receiver out of the backfield - or at least not a dangerous one.

NFL teams are scrambling to find new ways to gain 4 yds per rush with the wildcat and the spread. Line up in the I-form and plow it down the middle.

Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:19 am

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby Witchblade » Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:09 am

Summers looked real good as a FB on the Redman scores and a few other plays when he lined up there. I'd like to see him at the position earlier in the game. As far as the formations go, it is just PS so BS Arians gets a pass. One thing you might consider is the fact that the coaches didn't play Mendy more. If they were as doubtful as some of yall wouldn't ya think they'd play him more? I would if I had questions.
A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.
P. J. O'Rourke (1947 - )

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: Doubts about Mendenhall

Postby mckeesrockstheburg » Wed Aug 19, 2009 6:42 pm

FWP, Mendy, Redman, Tank and Moore. You have speed, experience, youth, blocking, pass-catching and game experience in this crew. Don't see where Davis is a "must keep". Need Moore as 3rd down safety valve and insurance for FWP again.
Do we win division last year without him? I think not.
I would even say we don't get to SB without his superb fill-in work and teamwork.

I read where they are thrilled with last pick TE Johnon's blocking. Does this push McHugh out the door?
Any inside scoop anyone? I'm in SC and all I get is website, Pgh papers online.

Next

Return to Stillers Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Don't be stingy, share: