Register

Board index » Stillers Talk » Running Behind a Fullback

Anything and everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers
Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:38 pm
Location: Heinz Field interviewing for the Offensive Coordinator position!

Running Behind a Fullback

Postby Bomberman » Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:08 am

Did anyone notice that Parker was given a fullback to run behind on Sunday? Do you think it was directly responsible for the 100+ yards he posted or was it just the Browns' run defense? Curious what others saw...






:sutimebomb:
Bomberman
Any problem can be solved with the correct application of explosives!

Greenhorned Rookie
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:38 am

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby zapunto » Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:17 am

To answer your question, both. Browns mailed it in yo.

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:54 am

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby Hagerstown Steelman » Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:37 am

Agree, a little of both. I don't think the Browns mailed it in. Just that their run defense has been horrible all year.

Good to see us get some yards. However, it will be tough sledding in the playoffs. Miami or Indy may be the worst run defenses in the AFC playoffs and they are not shabby.

Greenhorned Rookie
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:24 am

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby mikeyg » Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:24 am

I do think it helped

Arians is a pea brain

Most of the great RB's have a lead blocker - how MANY times did the Bus praise his 'bus driver'? Look at LT. Lorenze Neal led him for years.

I hope BA is fired the second we lose in the playoffs. He has as much creativity as I do in my pinky fingernail.

Willies wants and needs a FB - this will help with play action and openig up other crap down field. I am SO FIT TO BE TIED to watch this great defense go to waste do to the offense.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:21 am

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby IronCity__Man » Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:45 am

Hopefully that was a warm up to the playoffs. Steelers will increase their chances if they come out in two weeks with a blocking FB. I think Arians was finallly giving in - stubborn fool could have costed us a season with that single back shit.

Greenhorned Rookie
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:24 am

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby mikeyg » Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:01 pm

IronCity__Man wrote:Hopefully that was a warm up to the playoffs. Steelers will increase their chances if they come out in two weeks with a blocking FB. I think Arians was finallly giving in - stubborn fool could have costed us a season with that single back shit.


he is a fool for sure and will cost the Steelers in the playoffs (and him his job)

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby WoodsonOfSteel » Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:05 pm

If I recall correctly, the majority of Willie's yards came around the corner and not behind a fullback.

Willie is notorious for having big games against bad run defenses and even then, he doesn't do THAT well. The 'homerun' runs really pad otherwise atrocious stats.

I'm just sayin'.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Monroeville

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby jstallworth82 » Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:34 pm

I think that maybe it is a combination of many things including the inability of the O-Line to block anyone, the tenativeness of FWP, and a confidence thing which I think with that 34 yd TD may have gone away some. But with a FB or not if the O-Line doesn't block a FB can't block 7 guys. I like using a FB expecially if we could find one that could catch the rock. If we get a strong O-Line it will be hard for even Arians to stop us. But even if the team made that their number 1 priority it would not happen in 1 off season so it will be a 2 - 3 year process. We just have to run plays that don't take 3 minutes to develop and Ben needs to make quicker decisions. My thought would be to have Moore play a lot more in the 1st half and let FWP hurt the D in the later part of the game when they are tired and will have a hard time dealing with his speed. He gets the majority of his yards late anyway so let Moore soften up the D early.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:06 pm

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby El Nino » Mon Dec 29, 2008 7:26 pm

i wouldn't get too excited, it was the browns

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 2:16 am

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby Snockered Pedestrian » Mon Dec 29, 2008 7:51 pm

It would've made more sense to have drafted Owen Schmitt than Bruce Davis, but hindsight is always 20/20.

Grizzled Veteran
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby WoodsonOfSteel » Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:43 pm

Why not just bring Kreider back while you're at it?

Practice Squad
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:18 pm

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby KYSteelersFan » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:18 am

I dont know if anybody saw the hilights, but Michael Bush playing for the Raiders looked like a young Jerome Bettis. Big back punishing the defense. He walked all over the Bucs. He broke his leg his senior year at UL and was a 4th round pick. I get the sneaking feeling the Raiders got a sweet deal there. Wish the Stillers would have taken a chance on him. Damn I would love to see a big punishing back in Black and Gold again.

Seasoned Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:34 am

Re: Running Behind a Fullback

Postby westeelbelieve » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:26 am

run behind behind the MACK TRUCK Sean McHugh WOOOOOOOOOOO!
Image
WE STEEL BELIEVE

Return to Stillers Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Don't be stingy, share: