Board index » Game Threads Forum » Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
- thesteelhammer
- Stillers.com Team
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Nel wrote:Iron Gut wrote:Out of curiosity, is there a reason Mewelde Moore is not playing? Carey Davis simply isn't that good. Is Moore that Bad?
Moore can't block.
Good answer if true.
But makes me wonder HOW THE HELL HE IS OUR THIRD DOWN BACK THEN?
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Nel wrote:Iron Gut wrote:Out of curiosity, is there a reason Mewelde Moore is not playing? Carey Davis simply isn't that good. Is Moore that Bad?
Moore can't block.
That makes some sense. However, can't we use him to run?
- SnatchSacker
- Grizzled Veteran
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:32 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Nel wrote:Iron Gut wrote:Out of curiosity, is there a reason Mewelde Moore is not playing? Carey Davis simply isn't that good. Is Moore that Bad?
Moore can't block.
Then he fits perfectly with our line.
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
I like that Santonio is trying to make something happen on PR duty. He has good return instincts...
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Iron Gut wrote:Out of curiosity, is there a reason Mewelde Moore is not playing? Carey Davis simply isn't that good. Is Moore that Bad?
It's simple math, Moore = Less.
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
SnatchSacker wrote:Nel wrote:Iron Gut wrote:Out of curiosity, is there a reason Mewelde Moore is not playing? Carey Davis simply isn't that good. Is Moore that Bad?
Moore can't block.
Then he fits perfectly with our line.
- thecountoncleats
- Seasoned Veteran
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:33 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Iron Gut wrote:Nel wrote:Iron Gut wrote:Out of curiosity, is there a reason Mewelde Moore is not playing? Carey Davis simply isn't that good. Is Moore that Bad?
Moore can't block.
That makes some sense. However, can't we use him to run?
The OL is so porous that to get into the backfield on this man's Steelers blocking is more important than running. It's kind of like having to use a brilliant TE like Miller to block because your OL eats ass.
- StillLifer
- Greenhorned Rookie
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:52 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Sorta off topic, but I'm glad we got smeared by Philly early in the season. It was a "good" loss, IMO.
Moore= Less
Then he fits perfectly with our line.
Moore= Less
Then he fits perfectly with our line.
- SnatchSacker
- Grizzled Veteran
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:32 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Nel wrote:Iron Gut wrote:Out of curiosity, is there a reason Mewelde Moore is not playing? Carey Davis simply isn't that good. Is Moore that Bad?
Moore can't block.
Niether can our line, but they're playing!
- StillLifer
- Greenhorned Rookie
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:52 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Good run. Ben should have run more in the game with Philly. He had the lanes to do it several times.
- thesteelhammer
- Stillers.com Team
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Well the anouncers are off Flacco's jock.
Now they Tomlin.
Don't these Dumb Asses remember the first half?
Now they Tomlin.
Don't these Dumb Asses remember the first half?
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
Now the announcers are sucking Tomlin's dick. Steelers don't have a big defensive play and score, they are telling us why Harbaugh is the second coming of Lombardi.
- SnatchSacker
- Grizzled Veteran
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:32 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
StillLifer wrote:Sorta off topic, but I'm glad we got smeared by Philly early in the season. It was a "good" loss, IMO.
Moore= Less
Then he fits perfectly with our line.
It will only be a good loss if they learned.... and most importantly, make corrections from it. Which they clearly have not.
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
thesteelhammer wrote:Well the anouncers are off Flacco's jock.
Now they Tomlin.
Don't these Dumb Asses remember the first half?
Yikes, Great minds? LOL
- thesteelhammer
- Stillers.com Team
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
WHY DID Ward GO DOWN?
Dude, - RUN HIM OVER.
Wow, ben should have gotten rid of that though.
MArvel hurt. not good.
Dude, - RUN HIM OVER.
Wow, ben should have gotten rid of that though.
MArvel hurt. not good.
- Crosby4Life
- Seasoned Veteran
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 3:33 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
thesteelhammer wrote:WHY DID Ward GO DOWN?
Dude, - RUN HIM OVER.
Wow, ben should have gotten rid of that though.
MArvel hurt. not good.
He tried to cut it back, Heinz field would have none of it.
- thesteelhammer
- Stillers.com Team
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
We need 7 here.
DON'T TURTLE
DON'T TURTLE
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
thesteelhammer wrote:WHY DID Ward GO DOWN?
Dude, - RUN HIM OVER.
Wow, ben should have gotten rid of that though.
MArvel hurt. not good.
Is the grass wet, maybe? The temp has cooled off... in real time I asked the same thing.
- StillLifer
- Greenhorned Rookie
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:52 pm
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
That's what should happen... if Ben is surrounded, there should be a receiver open somewhere down the field. BAM!
Re: Stillers verse Ravens game 4 thread.
thesteelhammer wrote:WHY DID Ward GO DOWN?
Dude, - RUN HIM OVER.
Wow, ben should have gotten rid of that though.
MArvel hurt. not good.
Now we get to see the 7 Million Dollar Man
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests