Chelonaphobia and The Yertle
Turtle�������������� By Hesske
Sunday�s
win came as a pleasant surprise�okay, verging on shock�to this cynical fan of
50 years. After witnessing most (couldn�t bear to watch the replay of the
Before I
get to my main point�and the definition of my title word�I am of the philosophy
that any win during the season is a victory to be valued.� We were supposed to beat the Titans and we
did. The Packers, the Rams and the Broncos, to name a few,
should all be so fortunate after their first games.
Despite my
preceding disclaimer, I�m sure that many of you will dismissively scoff when I
express a current pressing concern I have with our team and its �identity.� But
express it I must.
Chelonaphobia means irrational fear of turtles, with, in this case, irrational
hopefully being the key word. But let me indulge myself anyways. Yesterday�s
game ended with 20 straight runs (or was it more?), from
First, let
me acknowledge the obvious: The turtle �worked.�� Taking a knee on every offensive play after
the score reached 34-7 would have been an equally effective�for purposes of
this one game��strategy.� Furthermore, Coach Bill �Yertle�
Cowher was able to crow once again in his post-game
about the overall effectiveness of The Turtle. True enough. As
far as it goes. What is he now: 5,000-1-1 in games that the
Steelers have led at half-time? �But I
ask, so what?�
I don�t
have a Phantom-type stat breakdown prepared to support my idea and even if it
did, I�m sure it would contradict my main assertion and clearly demonstrate the
overall effectiveness of the dreaded Turtle. But I do have a strong impression,
a nagging feeling, a gut instinct, that this tried and true or should I say
TIRED and true maneuver has served us less than well on several occasions,
making games against vastly inferior opponents tighter than they should have
been or, in a couple of instances, costing us a win.
Two
examples: Last year�s game against the offensively hapless Redskins got closer
than it should because of the dreaded Turtle and against
Yesterday
in
Yesterday,
Trivia made the observation that the starters were in too long against the
Titans and, believe it or not, I agree. But if the starters are going to be out
there why not let them play instead of Turtle?�
A couple of starters got dinged up�hopefully nothing serious�during the turtling marathon. I don�t presume cause and effect, but
we�ve all heard the tired old sports clich�often applied to football�about how
players get hurt when they let up. Cliches become
clich�s not because they are wrong but because they are usually true, a once
original idea gets worn out by repetition, not because it�s inaccurate.
����������
Even when
the second team came into the game, why not let them try a few things?� God forbid, but there is a chance we may need
Tommy Maddox to complete a few passes for us during a crucial juncture later in
the season. Here was a game situation where the reward for such a plan is
obvious and the risk is minimal, if not non-existent.
Of course
there is the old bromide about not running it up on an opponent because it can
be used against you as a motivator.� Now
THAT clich� may be true about high school and college, but I believe it�s pure horseshit when applied to professional athletics.
Yesterday
the Chiefs, leading 27-0, had a 4th Q goal line stand against the pitiful Jets
and then the first string O came out firing the ball downfield play after play.
Dick Vermeil believes in twisting the knife after you stick it in and so do I.
With the score Bengals 27 Browns 13 in the 4th Q the
same situation occurred and Cincy went from its own
10-yard line to deep in Cleveland territory in about 30 seconds, Palmer to
Johnson over and over.
The NFL is
not high school or college, it�s a business and one of the cornerstones of
American business�whether anyone wants to admit it or not�is that if you are
standing on a rival�s throat and the situation dictates it, then you start
grinding the foot.� I know more than a
few of you watched the Colts do this to the Ravens on Sunday night.
I�m not
saying that we should have endeavored to physically injure any of the Titans
yesterday, but why not run up the score�isn�t points differential one of the
criteria for a playoff tiebreaker?�to, say, 48-7?� Not only would that give the Titans many
troubling things�not revenge�to think about regarding next time, but it would
also give our next opponent something to ponder as well.� And to those who gnaw their nails, worrying
that a key interception could have gotten the Titans back into the game, I can
only say puh-leez.�
Midway through the 3rd quarter, the only jockeying for position by the Titans�
defense was for a prime spot on the team bus back to the airport.� The Titans quit and we eased up on them.� Former turtler Tony
Dungy did not do the same in
In my
opinion, the worn-out concept of �poor sportsmanship�, at the professional level,
comes only when you stop performing within the rules at maximum intensity
against your opponent (and, not incidentally, for the fans).� Or when someone orders the
players to gear it down.� In fact,
it's my opinion that the Titans began turtling not long
after we did yesterday. So what was the difference between the fourth quarter
of the game and professional wrestling? In both cases, two
"opponents" are engaged in an athletic exhibition where the outcome
has been pre-ordained.� Sportsmanship?
For an
example of how turtling can cost you big time, one
need look no further than Saturdays�
On Sunday
we lit up the Titans for two quarters plus and then turtled
to another victory. Let�s hope Yertle and company haven�t established a lack of offensive rhythm for
the Texans game or for a game further down the line. Right now I�m happy with
the victory, but cautious about the future. The great (and often maddening)
thing about football is that there�s always another game and it always begins
0-0. So we�ll see if I�m suffering from Chelonaphobia
or if the Turtle finally catches up with Yertle.